The impressive recent
growth of certain sectors of the Indian economy is a necessary but insufficient
condition for the elimination of extreme poverty.
In order to ensure
that the poorest benefit from this growth, and also contribute to it, the
expansion and improvement of the microfinance sector should be a national
priority. Studies suggest that the impact of microfinance on the poorest is
greater than on the poor, and yet another that non-participating members of
communities where microfinance operates experience socio-economic gains —
suggesting strong spillover effects. Moreover, well-managed microfinance
institutions (MFIs) have shown a capacity to wean themselves off of subsidies
and become sustainable within a few years.
Microfinance is powerful,
but it is clearly no panacea. Microfinance does not directly address some
structural problems facing Indian society and the economy, and it is not yet as
efficient as it will be when economies of scale are realized and a more
supportive policy environment is created.
Loan products are
still too inflexible, and savings and insurance services that the poor also
need are not widely available due to regulatory barriers.
Still, microfinance is
one of the few market-based, scalable anti-poverty solutions that is in place
in India today, and the argument to scale it up to meet the overwhelming need
is compelling. According to Sa-Dhan, the overall outreach is 6.5 million
families and the sector-wide loan portfolio is Rs 2,500 crore.
However, this is meeting
only 10% of the estimated demand. Importantly, new initiatives are expanding
this success story to the some of the country's poorest regions, such as
eastern and central Uttar Pradesh.
The local and national
governments have an important role to play in ensuring the growth and
improvement of microfinance. First and foremost, the market should be left to
set interest rates, not the state. Ensuring transparency and full disclosure of
rates including fees is something the government should ensure, and something
that new technologies as well as reporting and data standards are already
enabling.
Furthermore,
government regulators should set clear criteria for allowing MFIs to mobilize
savings for on-lending to the poor; this would allow for a large measure of
financial independence amongst well-managed MFIs. Each Indian state could
consider forming a multi-party working group to meet with microfinance leaders
and have a dialogue with them about how the policy environment could be made
more supportive and to clear up misperceptions.
There is an
opportunity to make a real dent in hard-core poverty through microfinance. By
unleashing the entrepreneurial talent of the poor, we will slowly but surely
transform India in ways we can only begin to imagine today.
Questions
1.
What could be the meaning of the word panacea
in the passage?
Solution
Problem
Solution
to all problems
Sustainable
solution
2.
Why, according to the author, should microfinance be
scaled up in India?
a. The demand for
microfinance is high. b. It is a market-based anti-poverty solution.
c. It is sustainable.
D. Both 1 and 2. E.
: 1, 2 and 3.
3.
Why are saving products not available?
a. Due to
inflexibility of loan products. B. Due
to regulatory restrictions.
c. Since insurance
services are not available. D. Saving products are not available.
4.
Why does the author talk about the 'entrepreneurial
talent of poor' in the concluding paragraph?
a. Entrepreneurship
among poor is encouraged by microfinance.
b. Entrepreneurship
among poor is an alternate to microfinance.
c. Entrepreneurship
among poor is discouraged by microfinance.
D. None of these
5.
Which of the following is not a challenge faced by
microfinance in India?
a. Does not help the
poorest.
B.Efficient when economy of scale is achieved.
c. Non-conducive
policy environment. D. Structural
problems of Indian society.
6.
Which of the following is correct with regard to
microfinance?
a. The supply is more
than demand.
B. The demand is more than supply.
c. The supply and
demand are well balanced. d.None of these can be inferred from
passage.
7.
What is the author's view about interest rates?
a. The government
should set them. B.There should be transparency with regard to them.
c. The market forces
should set them. D. Both 1 and 2. E. Both 2 and 3.
8.
Which of the following will the author agree to?
a. Indian economy
growth will solve the problem of poverty.
B. Indian economy
growth is not enough to solve the problem of poverty.
C. Indian economy
growth aggravates the problem of poverty.
D. None of these
No comments:
Post a Comment